quote:

So how could Fox have both the most balanced and the most anti-Obama coverage? Simple. It's because the other networks were all so pro-Obama.

...

In fact, Obama received the most favorable coverage CMPA has ever recorded for any presidential candidate since we began tracking election news coverage in 1988.

...

So the broadcast networks gave good marks to one candidate and bad marks to another, while Fox was tough on both--and most balanced overall.

quote:

ORIGINAL: davemiller7

This is a point which many people don't seem to grasp. It used to be taught in school (back in the day) but I think it is conveniently left out in today's politically correct education.

quote:

ORIGINAL: _jjp_

The government is a servant of the people in the US not the rulers of the people. As servants there are limitations on how they treat the citizens, businesses, and the press .... The US government has no business calling out any business/citizen which hasn't committed a crime.

quote:

ORIGINAL: its_GO_time

quote:

ORIGINAL: davemiller7

This is a point which many people don't seem to grasp. It used to be taught in school (back in the day) but I think it is conveniently left out in today's politically correct education.

quote:

ORIGINAL: _jjp_

The government is a servant of the people in the US not the rulers of the people. As servants there are limitations on how they treat the citizens, businesses, and the press .... The US government has no business calling out any business/citizen which hasn't committed a crime.

Please try to understand: We need a ruler. We cannot possibly handle liberty and freedom without someone leading us around by the nose... We demand a king!

quote:

All hail King Barry!!! But wait. Didn't the Israelites try that back around 1100 BC? That didn't work out too well for them. Oh well, they didn't have a leader like we do. All hail King Barry!!!