|
stamper_ben -> RE: While McCain works Obama practices. (9/26/2008 3:22:45 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: adelphi_sky quote:
ORIGINAL: jfwink Sorry, but "If I can be helpful..." I'll be there? Is not leadership. Sorry, but suspending your campaign to appear as if you're making a sacrifice by pridefully believing you're doing something heroic and irresponsibly injecting yourself into the very middle of something you know little about and mucking it all up isn't leadership either. Again, leadership is delegating those tasks to those who know what their doing. I do not know one CEO who is involved in everything his company does. When we have systems go down at our job, the CEO is NOT in the datacenter. He is in another state and more than likely unaware. It's up to the managers, the directors, and perhaps the presidents if it's serious enough. Therefore, does the CEO actually have something to contribute in this case? Even if the company is shutdown, it's the responsibility of the CEO to communicate to the shareholders and the public what is going on. He is NOT involved in every little detail. He makes decisions based on the information fed to him from the executive staff. What more could the CEO add? "Get the server back up?" "Work harder?" He has an MBA, not a certification on the systems that are having the problems. Therefore, to me, a leader does not have to know every detail. We learn this in information systems management. You have the day-to-day systems, then you have the executive decision support systems. The day-to-day systems provide daily line-by-line transaction data to the line managers. That data is fed into a larger system that is then condensed and presented to Executives in a general format. They see pie charts and bar graphs. CEO's don't see much more detail. They don't need to. Again, I'll ask, is president Bush involved in the hourly negotiations? Is he not a leader because he's waiting on information from his "line managers?" As I see it, you keep missing the point that this is a wee bit more of an issue than "the server going out." If a CEO, and by extension the wanna-be President, does not know at least the basics of what is going on in the "company" and is "unaware" then he or she is unfit to lead, no matter how many flunkies they have scrambling to fix the issue. Again, this is NOT the "datacenter" that is melting down here in the country.
|
|
|
|