|
fiat_lux -> RE: Did God create light, day, night, and plants before He created the Sun? (9/27/2008 8:33:44 AM)
|
quote:
I don't think the authors of Genesis understood the daylight was caused by the sun. I'm sure the authors didn't understand the sun provides warmth and the energy required to power the earths geographic and weather systems. Of course the authors of the OT also did not understand the light is just one spectrum of electromagnetic energy that eyes happen to be sensitive to. Much more important would be infer-red spectrum (also know as heat). Why didn't God say, "Let there be warmth"? Despite unclemonkey's mockery, you're right that they're probably didn't. However, as I understand it, the creationist argument that he's putting forward (and even more so certain theistic evolutionists do this, so I'm not trying to single anyone out) suggests that God hid modern scientific knowledge in the Bible which wasn't known to either its writers or most of its readers throughout history, but which we can recognize today. Hence, for example, his claim that when the Bible says God created light, it means God created everything along the electromagnetic spectrum, despite the fact that we have no evidence the original Hebrew writers or readers would have understood it that way. (An interesting divergence from the usual contention that to interpret the Bible we have to understand ancient culture.) I am of course speculating about someone else's beliefs here so unclemonkey is welcome to come in and tell me this is rubbish. quote:
If the answer is "God can do anything", then what's the point of all those crazy "scientific" speculations in AiG. Why not just explain all discrepancies between scientific evidence and the OT with "God can do anything"? I don't think the authors of Genesis understood the daylight was caused by the sun. I'm sure the authors didn't understand the sun provides warmth and the energy required to power the earths geographic and weather systems. How else would they explain it? Look, if you're going to accept divine influence at any stage in the development of our solar system, then mechanistic scientific explanations already aren't going to work, and the "God did it" explanation is going to surface again and again. Why, for example, would it matter if plants couldn't have survived the night before the sun was created under natural conditions, if we're already accepting, at least for the sake of argument, that --a-- God created the plants, and --b-- God created the sun?
|
|
|
|