|
Jhud -> RE: Why Is A Canadate's Past Is Fair Game For The Media and The Opposing Parties? (8/31/2008 7:52:29 PM)
|
Gayle, let me see if I can break this down for you. First off , I think it's fairly obvious that candidates 'past' is fair game, because we have no other basis by which to judge the veracity of someone's words than by the actions they have taken previously. Obviously though, there are action that we all take over the course of our lives that don't look good - and some of them may or may not be relevant. So for example Obama's past self-admitted drug use would only be relevant if there is an indication that he still had a problem with drugs - there is no indications of that. The troubles of McCains first marriage might be relevant if they seemed to define him now, and he hadn't already acknowledged them as a moral failing. In the case of Clinton, his indiscretions though hinted at earlier, came to light in the course of an investigation into something else - and there was every indication that it was ongoing - so that would certainly be a concern. But as you have noted, there is another sort of strategy that we as Christians should not only not practice, but that we should condemn - and that is the whisper campaign. A whisper campaign is no different than what the Bible calls gossip, except it is used for political purposes. Is not a product f verifiable facts, but simply a set of ideas put out there to slime a candidate - they are almost impossible to respond to without becoming associated with the morally reprehensible people who propagate them. Recent examples of whisper campaigns include: - Obama's presumed Islamic beliefs - McCain's illegitimate African American baby - This latest posting concerning Palin's daughter Make no mistake - these are reprehensible acts, something that represent the lowest possible moral choices; someone who does such things intentionally hates truth and seeks only to smear another person's good name for selfish game. It is in essence Satanic, the product of someone who would be a conduit for lies. For example, the website the poster linked to was completely indicative of this sort of scheme - no author, no reliable news report, just a black, evil lie, proffered for the consumption of the gullible. It's as cowardly as it is wicked, and such a person who intentionally does such things should not only be disregarded, but actively condemned.
|
|
|
|