|
selahgirl -> RE: Trial: Treating Hep C? (8/19/2008 10:58:19 AM)
|
I contracted the virus when I was 14 years old, during back surgery for scoliosis. It was a nine hour surgery to put a rod in my back, that resulted in my losing half the blood in my body. There was no test for Hep C at that time, and I responded very badly to the blood I was given. That was in 1979. In 1993, while pregnant with my third child, I was diagnosed with Hep C. A reliable test wasn't developed until the year prior to that time (in 1992). When the disease was first identified, the blood supply in the US was screened and it was found that 8-10% was contaminated with the virus. That means that everyone receiving blood transfusions before that time, would be wise to be checked for hep C. It is a specifically requested test, it will not show up in a standard blood test. You could have it and not have symptoms yet, so your doctor may have no idea you have it. The only way to know it to have the test done. My family has all been tested, my father before he passed away (from throat cancer), my siblings, my husband, and my children... all tested negative. So while it is the second most serious of the hep C viruses, it is the most difficult to catch. It was identified on the heels of the AIDS scare so people thought it was spreading just as quickly and easily. But the sudden increase in cases was because they finally had a way to test for it. Since that time, it has been discovered that while it can be spread, it was not spreading at the alarming rate they first thought.
|
|
|
|