|
kingdust -> RE: Love - covering the nakedness of another (8/3/2008 8:48:59 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: stampinlady quote:
if we can say we are clothed with Christ and know what that means, why can't we say He has covered my sins and know what that means as well Because He didn't cover our sins he took them away. I can't explain the deeper theological meaning, but to me there's a differance between my sins being covered and my sins being taken away. If our sins were still here we'd have to offer sacrifices again and again.[8D][&:] If 'nakedness' is referred to 'sin' only, only then nakedness can be taken away once and for all, leaving behind nothing to cover, no need to cover, no desire to be covered at all, after the switching of the robe. If that is the case, what was with the rich man in a rich church in Laodicea who was told that he was naked and in need of cover? quote:
You say, `I am rich; I have acquired wealth and do not need a thing.' But you do not realize that you are wretched, pitiful, poor, blind and naked. [18] I counsel you to buy from me gold refined in the fire, so you can become rich; and white clothes to wear, so you can cover your shameful nakedness; and salve to put on your eyes, so you can see. What about those who would be in bed, naked, and would get caught off guard by a thief? quote:
REV 16:15 "Behold, I come like a thief! Blessed is he who stays awake and keeps his clothes with him, so that he may not go naked and be shamefully exposed." We are to sleep in our cloth, if we don't want to be found naked by a thief?! If 'covering' only refers to sin taken away once for all, why would we still need cover even in our sleep?
|
|
|
|