|
cow451 -> RE: 9-11, anyone? (5/28/2008 11:33:58 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: 1dblthnk02 quote:
ORIGINAL: cow451 One pops up about once a month and the nutcases flame out after a few rounds of rebuke. Why am I not surprised? quote:
Care to start the discussion? Well, maybe it's not a good idea after all. I was just wondering, but now you've told me. When it comes to the 9-11 ct, I am a skeptic: that is, I need a better, clearer argument for a conspiracy. Everything that I have read and heard so far is too self-contradictory and loose-ended. Also, some of the arguments are very refutable. That being said, I am not convinced that everything is on the up & up, either. The way that the Bush administration pinned (by implication) the whole thing on Iraq was fishy at best. Well they pinned it on Al Qaida/Taliban/Afghanistan. Saudi Arabia got a pass of which they have an unlimited supply, it seems. They encouraged folks to believe Iraq was connected to Al Qaida as a way to build support for the Iraq invasion. Bin Laden's agenda was to induce the west to send in their armies so more infidels could be killed (assuming the Western powers will not give up their Middle East and Asian interests easily). It's a lot easier to kill infidels over there, he reasoned. After all, highly successful terrorist attacks (like 9/11) are difficult to pull off from such a great distance, IMHO.
|
|
|
|