|
x_SoliDeoGloria_x -> RE: Is church too feminine? (3/28/2008 10:15:33 PM)
|
I think that recent trends in church architecture also reflect the feminization of the church. For example, many of the recently built non-liturgical churches that I have visited seem to be trying to create a theater type atmosphere, with the focal point being the stage (yes, they even call it a stage) where the worship team performs with a lot of thought put into the lighting effects, sound system, etc., all geared to enhance the audience's enjoyment of the performance. Then there is all the nice carpeting in soothing, neutral colors, the recessed lighting, the comfy seats, etc. This might sound sexist, but it seems that on some level, the whole setting is designed to appeal to the worshipper's feminine, "touchy-feely" side, as in "Oh, don't you just love going to the theater/symphony/opera/whatever." My sister recently told me that she and her husband visited one of these churches on a Sunday morinig, and when the usher escorted them into the sanctuary (excuse me -- auditorium) she smiled and said "Enjoy the Show!"[sm=popsigh.gif] In contrast, when you walk into one of the old churches in my city, you're reminded more of a medieval cathedral, with traditional church architecture, stone and darkly stained wood instead of carpeting, massive lamps hanging from the ceiling by iron chains, etc. I'm probably sounding sexist again, but to me this seems like a more masculine type setting, telling me, at least on a subliminal level, that I am here to stand in awe of and worship the transcendent creator of the universe and redeemer of mankind (which I think is more of a guy thing), rather than to nurture my inner spiritual self (which I associate more with the feminine side of things). To put it briefly, I guess I'm talking about what I see as the "Oprah-fication" of church architecture as one more factor in the feminization of the church.
|
|
|
|